Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar;20(1):55–64. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v20i1.69429

Table 2.

PEP of HIV - knowledge of respondent health workers of Governmental Health Institutions in Jimma

Variables Medical
Dr. (n=6)
Laboratory
Tech.
(n=37)
Nursing /
Health
assist.
(n=173)
Health
Officer
(n=15)
Midwife
(n=23)
Total
(n=254)
N. (%) N.(%) N(%) N(%) N(%) N(%)
PEP of HIV Knowledge Level:
Adequate knowledge 3(50.0) 5(13.5) 22(12.7) 3(20.0) 8(34.8) 41(16.1)
Inadequate knowledge 3(50.0) 32(86.5) 151(87.3) 12(80.0) 15(65.2) 213(83.9)
Response for selected knowledge
questions:
PEP reduces the likelihood of HIV
infection after exposure
Correct response 6(100.0) - 24(64.9)13 119(68.8)54 15(100.0) 19(82.6)4 183(72.0)71
Not correct response (35.1) (31.2) - (17.4) (28.0)
Measures to be taken after someone
encounters needle stick injury at work
place
Correct response 4(66.7) 2 20(54.1)17 96(55.5) 77 9(60.0) 6 12(52.2)11 141(55.5)
Not correct response (33.3) (45.9) (44.5) (40.0) (47.8) 113(44.5)
Procedures of PEP of HIV
Correct response 5(83.3) 9(24.3) 28 42(24.3) 131 5(33.3) 9(31.1) 70(27.6)
Not correct response 1(16.7) (75.7) (75.7) 10(66.7) 14(60.9) 184(72.4)
Measures to be taken when someone
exposed to patients' blood
Correct response 2(33.3) 4 14(37.8) 59(34.1) 8(53.3) 10(43.5)13 93(36.6)
Not correct response (66.7) 23(66.2) 114(65.9) 7(46.7) (56.5) 161(63.4)

Zone, Oct–Dec. 2008.