Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 7;2011:381080. doi: 10.4061/2011/381080

Table 2.

Effect of extracellular matrix on differentiation of xenografts.

MEC 1 SC2 ECM N 3 x/T 4 Outcome
None hTert MSC (2 × 105) Matrigel orCol I plus matrigel (3 : 1) 8 No growth or no xenogratfs
MCF7 (2 × 105) None Col I plus matrigel (3 : 1) 8 0/16 Solid tumor
MCF7/CEACAM1-4S (2 × 105) None Col I plus matrigel (3 : 1) 8 0/16 Solid tumor and no differentiation
MCF7 (2 × 105) hTert MSC (2 × 105) None 8 0/4 Solid tumor and low engraftment
MCF7/CEACAM1-4S (2 × 105) hTert MSC (2 × 105) None 8 0/3 Solid tumor and low engraftment
MCF7 (2 × 105) None Matrigel 8 0/16 Solid tumor
MCF7/CEACAM1-4S (2 × 105) None Matrigel 8 15/16* Differentiation into acini

1Mammary epithelial cellline (number of cells injected), 2Stromal cell line (number of cells injected), 3Number of animals, 4Number of xenografts exhibiting gland-like structures (x)/Total number of xenografts (T), *indicates statistical significance (P < .01) for differentiation of xenografts, when compared with all other groups in this table.