Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 1;1(2):161–169. doi: 10.1534/g3.111.000265

Table 2 . Deficiencies that enhance or suppress X NDJ of X/X;bubR1D1326N/bubR1rev1 females.

Cytogenetic Breakpoints Normal ProgenyX/XY and X/O Exceptional Progeny Total Adjusted Progeny Δ With Matched Controla Δ With Average Controlb
Deficiency Name XX/O O/XY X NDJ Candidate
Enhancer deficiencies
 Df(3L)BSC23 62E8;63B5-6 550 127 16 836 34.21%c 14.70% 8.39% Mrtf; aly
 Df(3L)BSC13 66B12-C1;66D2-4 841 281 14 1431 41.23%c 18.24% 15.41% mtrm
 Df(3L)Pc-2q 78C5-6;78E3-79A1 323 109 15 571 43.43%c 18.43% 17.61% pzg; Pc; SAK
 Df(3R)ED5177 83B4;83B6 462 105 16 704 34.38%c 9.84% 8.56% asl
 Df(3R)ED5780 89E11;90C1 61 22 4 113 46.02%c 17.16% 20.20% cal1; ald
 Df(3R)D605 97E2;98A3-4 274 85 15 474 42.19%c 17.19% 16.37% Klp98A
Suppressor deficiencies
 Df(3L)pbl-X1 65F6;66B7-8 780 30 19 878 11.16%c −11.83% −14.66% Pdp1;pbl; Arp66B
 Df(3L)ZP1 66A17-20;66C1-5 968 81 21 1172 17.41%c −5.58% −8.41% pbl; Arp66B
 Df(3L)BSC8 74D3-75A1;75B2-5 687 56 17 833 17.53%c −7.01% −8.29% CycT
 Df(3L)ED4858 76D3;77C1 566 23 13 638 11.29%c −17.58% −14.53% polo
 Df(3L)rdgC-co2 77A1;77D1 686 37 11 782 12.28%c −14.68% −13.54% polo
 Df(3L)ED4978 78D5;79A2 1712 69 27 1904 10.08%c −6.52% −15.74%
 Df(3L)Ten-m-AL29 79C1-3;79E3-8 1079 64 19 1245 13.33%c −6.17% −12.49%
 Df(3R)Tpl10 83C1-2;84B1-2, 83D4-5;84A4-5;98F1-2 647 20 22 731 11.49%c −8.02% −14.33% bcd
 Df(3R)GB104 85D12;85E10 189 2 1 195 3.08%c −13.52% −22.74% βTub85D; hyd; αTub85E; topi
 Df(3R)ED5559 86E11;87B11 270 0 0 270 0.00%c −21.34% −25.82% aur; ssp5
 Df(3R)sbd105 88F9-89A1;89B9-10 1022 106 23 1280 20.16%c −15.05% −5.66% c(3)G; msps
 Df(3R)ED5942 91F12;92B3 725 78 18 917 20.94%c −6.47% −4.88%
 Df(3R)BSC55 94D2-10;94E1-6 613 43 20 739 17.05%c −10.36% −8.77% sav
 Df(3R)mbc-30 95A5-7;95C10-11 181 8 1 199 9.05%c −18.37% −16.77% Rpn9; eIF4G2; Pros26.4; CG13599; SMC1
 Df(3R)mbc-R1 95A5-7;95D6-11 1302 32 49 1464 11.07%c −20.22% −14.75% Rpn9; eIF4G2; Pros26.4; CG13599; SMC1
 Df(3R)Exel6202 96D1;96D1 837 64 29 1023 18.18%c −10.68% −7.64%
 Df(3R)BSC42 98B1-2;98B3-5 1849 126 35 2171 14.83%c −16.45% −10.99% Sce; btz
 Df(3R)3450 98E3;99A6-8 1003 42 28 1143 12.25%c −7.26% −13.57% Doa; Slu7; yemaα; dgt6; Slbp; stg
a

Difference between X NDJ of the deficiency-bearing flies vs. matched control.

b

Difference between X NDJ of the deficiency-bearing flies vs. average controls.

c

The percentage of X NDJ is significantly higher/lower than in X/X;bubR1D1326N/bubR1rev1 females (multinomial-Poisson hierarchy model, P < 0.05).