Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 23;23(1):104–111. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr032

Table 4.

False-positive risk and cancer detection by women's characteristics (adjusted by screening-protocol characteristics) (N = 2 777 429)

Screening mammograms Multivariate analysis (OR, 95% CI)a
False-positive risk (all procedures) False-positive risk (invasive procedures) Cancer detection
Age at screening (years)
    44–49 469 047 1.50 (1.46–1.54)b 1.44 (1.30–1.58)b 0.39 (0.35–0.43)b
    50–54 699 256 1.26 (1.23–1.29)b 1.26 (1.15–1.37)b 0.48 (0.44–0.52)b
    55–59 695 921 1.13 (1.10–1.16) 1.06 (0.97–1.16) 0.67 (0.62–0.73)b
    60–64 633 845 1.06 (1.03–1.09) 0.96 (0.88–1.06) 0.84 (0.77–0.90)b
    65–69 279 360 Ref. Ref. Ref.
HRT
    No 2 485 550 Ref. Ref. Ref.
    Yes 291 879 1.03 (1.01–1.05)b 0.84 (0.78–0.90)b 0.86 (0.80–0.94)b
Menopause
    Menopausal 2 157 627 Ref. Ref. Ref.
    Premenopausal 619 802 1.31 (1.29–1.33)b 1.22 (1.16–1.29)b 1.16 (1.07–1.25)b
Previous invasive procedure
    No 2 585 871 Ref. Ref. Ref.
    Yes 191 558 1.52 (1.49–1.56)b 2.00 (1.89–2.12)b 1.31 (1.20–1.42)b
Familial breast cancer
    No 2 581 981 Ref. Ref. Ref.
    Yes 195 448 1.18 (1.15–1.20)b 1.21 (1.13–1.30)b 1.66 (1.55–1.79)b

Menopause: pre-/perimenopausal or menopausal status; previous invasive procedure: personal previous invasive procedure; familial breast cancer: first-degree familial history of breast cancer previously described.

a

Multivariate analysis adjusted by women's screening number, screening period, radiology unit (random effect) and reading-protocol variables (reading method, number of views, mammography type).

b

Significant at the 95% CI.

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; HRT, hormone replacement therapy.