Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar;35(1):82–91. doi: 10.1152/advan.00125.2010

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Comparison of light and electrically evoked excitatory junctional potential (LEJPs and EEJPs, respectively) in the absence of motor neuron cell bodies and ventral ganglion (VG) circuitry. A: schematic of a dissected larval preparation. The brain and ventral ganglion were removed. A single segmental nerve was stimulated via suction electrode. Larval muscle 6 was targeted for recording. B: long time-base recording showing a typical experiment. One motor unit was recruited with the lowest stimulus voltage. An additional motor unit was recruited as the electrical stimulus intensity increased. LEJPs were evoked by 2.5- to 10-ms light pulses. C: expanded time-base views of EEJPs and LEJPs shown in B. D–F: LEJPs showed amplitudes and time courses that were not statistically different from EEJPs evoked by the low-threshold motor unit (F > 0.05 by one-way ANOVA). Data from 1-ms light pulses are not shown because they did not evoke LEJPs in any preparations. In pooled data, resting membrane potentials were between −40 and −55 mV. Resting membrane potentials were not significantly different across stimulation types (F > 0.05 by one-way ANOVA; data not shown). Pooled data are presented as means ± SE. *Significant difference compared with all other conditions (P < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA with the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test).