TABLE 4.
Subspecialty Topic | Residents rating topic as less important n =127 | Programs viewed as placing less importance on topic n =127 | PD rating topic as less important n=10 |
---|---|---|---|
Areas in which recent graduates felt deficient | |||
The medical aspects of palliative care (medical expert) | 30 | 60 | 20 |
Managing an efficient office practice (manager) | 25 | 74 | 20 |
Dealing with death and bereaved parents (medical expert) | 14 | 46 | 0 |
Areas in which recent graduates felt competent | |||
Ability to conduct a research project (scholar) | 38 | 11 | 20 |
Learning principles of quality management (manager) | 28 | 54 | 20 |
Conflict resolution (manager) | 24 | 52 | 20 |
Effective use of resources (manager) | 21 | 53 | 10 |
Working with socioeconomic differences (communicator) | 19 | 42 | 10 |
Working with cultural differences (communicator) | 17 | 46 | 10 |
Anticipatory well child care (medical expert) | 15 | 43 | 0 |
Complex chronic care (medical expert) | 13 | 18 | 0 |
Advocate for disadvantaged infants/children (health advocate) | 13 | 40 | 10 |
Teaching skills (medical expert) | 11 | 26 | 0 |
Data presented as %. Column 1 lists the CanMEDS roles believed to be least important by residents themselves; column 2 indicates the actual percentage of residents rating these topics as less important. Column 3 shows the percentage of programs perceived by residents to place less importance in these roles. Column 4 lists the percentage of program directors that rated these topics as less important to resident learning. The table is subdivided into two sections: the areas where recently graduated Canadian paediatricians felt deficient