Table 4. ^a Geometric Mean (GM) number and the 95% confidence intervals (CI) of mosquitoes caught in the Ifakara experimental huts. whenever baffles were used compared to when no baffles were used.

	Anopheles arabiensis							Total mosquitoes
	Without baffles		With baffles		Relative Rate			Without baffles		With baffles		Relative Rate
Trap type	GM	CI	GM	CI	RR	CI	P	GM	CI	GM	CI	RR	CI	P
CDC	74.5	45.8 121.2	96.7	69.9–133.7	1.3	1.1–1.6	0.009	152.7	98.3–237.2	181.8	133.8–247.0	1.2	0.9–1.6	*N.S.
Window exit traps	35.3	16.5–75.3	61.0	31.7–117.2	1.6	1.0–2.4	0.033	72.8	45.1–117.5	123.0	81.6–185.4	1.6	1.1–2.3	0.009
Eave exit traps	5.89	3.4–10.0	15.4	8.9–26.5	2.90	1.9–4.5	<0.001	8.4	5.0–14.1	24.1	16.4–35.4	2.7	1.9–3.8	<0.001

^aThe Relative Rate (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the mosquito counts were calculated from Generalized Linear Models.

*N.S refers to, ‘not significantly different’.