. 2012 Feb;190(2):413–435. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.132563

Table 4 .

Performance of traditional and Bayesian models in inference and prediction for 100 simulated complete eight-way diallels with five replicates and additive effects

				BayesDiallel
Simulated component		Griffing linear model		Standard normal model					Outlier model
									Full model			BayesSpike:
		GCA:	GCA + SCA:	Full model:	Minimum DIC model:	True model:	Full hglm fit:	BayesSpike:	d.f. = 3:	d.f. = 6:	d.f. = 15:	d.f. = 6:
Name	Discrepancy	“a”	“av”	“Babmvw”	—	“a”	“Babmvw”	—	“Babmvw”	“Babmvw”	“Babmvw”	—
Additive (a)	$\sum {({\hat{a}}_{j} - a_{j})}^{2}$	10.85	144.56	10.69	10.69	10.67	10.74	10.73	12.02	11.15	10.77	11.20
Additive (a)	$\sum {({\hat{a}}_{j} - a_{j})}^{2}$	(2.5, 23.6)	(57, 266.2)	(2.7, 22.9)	(2.7, 23)	(2.8, 22.7)	(2.7, 24.7)	(2.8, 23.2)	(3.4, 28.3)	(2.8, 24.4)	(2.6, 23.2)	(2.8, 24.7)
Inbreeding (b)	$\sum {({\hat{b}}_{j} - b_{j})}^{2}$	0.00	0.00	4.60	2.88	0.00	18.47	0.04	8.19	5.96	4.87	0.19
Inbreeding (b)	$\sum {({\hat{b}}_{j} - b_{j})}^{2}$	—	—	(0.3, 29.1)	(0, 24.3)	—	(0, 147.5)	(0, 0.1)	(0.4, 55)	(0.3, 31.3)	(0.3, 27.9)	(0, 0.1)
Maternal (m)	$\sum {({\hat{m}}_{j} - m_{j})}^{2}$	0.00	0.00	1.37	0.91	0.00	0.78	0.22	1.73	1.53	1.41	0.27
Maternal (m)	$\sum {({\hat{m}}_{j} - m_{j})}^{2}$	—	—	(0.1, 5)	(0, 5.9)	—	(0, 7.1)	(0, 3)	(0.2, 6.8)	(0.2, 6)	(0.1, 5.8)	(0, 3.7)
Symmetric (v)	$\sum {({\hat{v}}_{j k} - v_{j k})}^{2}$	0.00	2126.47	5.50	3.69	0.00	13.13	0.26	12.09	7.76	5.98	0.91
Symmetric (v)	$\sum {({\hat{v}}_{j k} - v_{j k})}^{2}$	—	(860.2, 3899.1)	(0.9, 23.1)	(0, 24.5)	—	(0.1, 64.7)	(0, 0.8)	(1.3, 70.1)	(0.9, 37.1)	(0.9, 25.3)	(0, 10.3)
Prediction MSE^a		123.09	311.82	124.32	123.79	123.09	124.78	123.43	125.24	124.65	124.39	123.69
Prediction MSE^a		(120.5, 125.8)	(306.7, 316.7)	(121.7, 127)	(121.2, 126.5)	(120.6, 125.8)	(122.2, 127.4)	(120.9, 126.2)	(122.6, 128)	(122, 127.4)	(121.8, 127.1)	(121.2, 126.5)

Mean and 95% confidence interval of MSEs from 50 independent simulation experiments.