Table A2.
Parietal cortex regions that showed significantly greater activation for negative than positive problems and their relationship to cyto-architectonic maps of the parietal cortex.
| Region | Number of voxels in the region | % of cluster in region | % of region activated |
|---|---|---|---|
| RIGHT IPS (30, −64, 48) | |||
| R hIP1 | 48 | 11.9 | 21.1 |
| R hIP3 | 45 | 11.2 | 14.8 |
| R area 2 | 24 | 5.8 | 2.5 |
| LEFT IPS (−30, −52, 38) | |||
| L hIP1 | 22 | 25.0 | 4.8 |
| LEFT IPS/SPL (−38, −54, 54) | |||
| L hIP1 | 22 | 48.9 | 4.7 |
| L hIP3 | 14 | 32.4 | 5.1 |
| L SPL 7PC | 3 | 7.4 | 1.6 |
| L hIP2 | 2 | 4.5 | 0.9 |
| L SPL 7A | 2 | 4.5 | 0.1 |
| L area 2 | 1 | 2.3 | 0.1 |
| LEFT POSTERIOR IPS (−24, −68, 42) | |||
| No overlap with cyto-architectonic areas | |||
For each significant cluster, the probabilistic region, percentage of activation in the region, percentage of cluster that was in the region is reported. Cyto-architectonically defined probability maps were used to interpret the locations of the cluster and peaks within subdivisions of the intraparietal sulcus (IPS), superior parietal lobule (SPL), and somatosensory Brodmann area 2.