Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 10;6:14. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00014

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of age, years of education, and gender for training groups.

Magnocellular training Parvocellular training No training Between group comparison
Value Significance
Age μ = 23.9 ± 2.4 μ = 23.3 ± 2.5 μ = 25.9 ± 3.3 F = 2.6 0.094
Years of education μ = 13.0 ± 1.6 μ = 14.1 ± 3.1 μ = 15.0 ± 2.7 F = 1.7 0.21
Gender n(women) = 7 n(women) = 8 n(women) = 8 X2 = 0.70 0.70
n(men) = 4 n(men) = 3 n(men) = 2

The three training groups (magnocellular, parvocellular, and no training) did not significantly differ in mean age or years of education as determined by ANOVA, and did not differ in gender distribution as determined by a chi-squared test.