Table 1.
Magnocellular training | Parvocellular training | No training | Between group comparison | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Value | Significance | ||||
Age | μ = 23.9 ± 2.4 | μ = 23.3 ± 2.5 | μ = 25.9 ± 3.3 | F = 2.6 | 0.094 |
Years of education | μ = 13.0 ± 1.6 | μ = 14.1 ± 3.1 | μ = 15.0 ± 2.7 | F = 1.7 | 0.21 |
Gender | n(women) = 7 | n(women) = 8 | n(women) = 8 | X2 = 0.70 | 0.70 |
n(men) = 4 | n(men) = 3 | n(men) = 2 |
The three training groups (magnocellular, parvocellular, and no training) did not significantly differ in mean age or years of education as determined by ANOVA, and did not differ in gender distribution as determined by a chi-squared test.