Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Mammal. 2011 Feb;92(1):54–64. doi: 10.1644/09-MAMM-S-317.1

Table 1.

Summary of resource-based models and predicted effects of changes in resources on group size, mating systems, and spatial organization.

Model Ecological variable to increase Change in group size Change in mating system Change in home-range features Advantage to sociality References
Polygamy potential Spatial distribution of resources Increase Monogamy → polygamy Group defends 1 high-quality patch Increase access to additional mates or resources Emlen and Oring (1977)
Habitat-variability mating system model = resource defense Patchiness and quality of resources Increase Monogamy → polygyny Home-range size increases and group defends multiple high-quality patches Increase access to high-quality resources Slobodchikoff (1984); Travis et al. (1995)
Female dispersion– male behavior Abundance and quality of food Increase Monogamy → polygyny Home-range size decreases Increase access to mates (for males) Brashares and Arcese (2002)
Resource dispersion Temporal and spatial heterogeneity, richness, and dispersion of resources Increase Not applicable Home-range size increases Neutral Johnson et al. (2002); Macdonald (1983)