Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 23;109(6):2144–2149. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117717109

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Emergent representation of sound class during behavior. (A) Average fraction change in raw neural response to target (black) and reference (gray) during approach behavior, grouped by BF-target frequency distance (n = 270 neurons with both reference and target data collected during passive listening and behavior). Neurons with BF within 0.1 octave of target frequency showed decreased target vs. reference responses (*P < 0.01), whereas other neurons showed no consistent target response change. Reference responses tended to increase, regardless of BF. (B) Change in raw response during avoidance, plotted as in A (n = 174). Average target responses increased for BF within 0.1 octave of target, whereas reference responses tended to decrease for all neurons. Changes in both A and B are consistent with enhanced reference-target discriminability. (C) Performance of a linear decoder trained to discriminate reference and target sounds from neural responses during approach behavior (red) and passive listening (green, n = 270). Crosses indicate average fraction of correct classifications as a function of the number of neurons in the decoder, fit by a decaying exponential (dashed lines). On average, 11.2 neurons were required to achieve 90% accuracy during behavior, and 16.0 were required during passive listening (bars, Lower, P < 0.001). (D) Performance of a linear decoder trained on avoidance data, plotted as in C (n = 151). During behavior, an average of 13.6 neurons was required to achieve 90% accuracy, and an average of 19.2 was required during passive listening (P < 0.001).