Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contraception. 2011 Sep 28;85(4):359–362. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.08.005

Table 2.

Characteristics of the 29 women who received the LNG-IUS, at insertion, by whether or not the LNG-IUS expelled during the study period

Characteristic Not expelled (N=18) Expelled (n=11) p-value
Age 26 [23, 29] 21 [21, 24] <0.01
Gravidity 3 [2,4] 3 [1,4] 0.61
Parity 2 [1,2] 1 [0,2] 0.34
Married or cohabitating 7 (39) 2(18)
Time interval IUD insertion (h) 19 [11,24] 23 [12,27] 0.43
Cervix dilation (cm) 3 [2,4] 2 [2,4] 0.18
Uterine size at insertion (wks) 18 [16, 18] 19 [18,20] 0.10
Received perineal lacerations at delivery 5 (28) 7(64) 0.06
Reported discomfort, scale 1–10 1 [1,3] 3 [1,6] 0.21
Would recommend to a friend at insertion 18(100) 11(100)
Method of insertion 0.59
 Hand 2 (11) 2 (20)
 Forceps 17 (89) 8 (80)
 Inserter 0 0
IUD in place at study exit
 Yes 17 0
 No 1 11

Data represented as n(%) with 95% confidence interval unless otherwise stated, or median [1st, 3rdquartiles].