Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2011 Dec 16;80(3):825–838. doi: 10.1002/prot.23241

Table III. Recoveries and energies of weight optimized standard + unfolded state energy functions.

This table reports the native sequence recoveries, largest hydrophobic patch area and total hydrophobic surface area averages for various weight optimized energy functions. The energy functions tested include a reweighted standard energy function that replaces the reference energies with the unfolded state energy term (“standard, no refE + unfoldedE”) and the same energy function with the hpatch-SASA score (“standard, no refE + unfoldedE, hpatch-SASA”). Both of the reweighted energy functions were optimized for native sequence recovery alone. Extra χ1 and χ2 rotamers used for all residues (−ex1 −ex2 −extrachi_cutoff 0).

recovery avg QUILT
patch
−ep 1.4
-R
% hp on
surface
avg total
hASA
−ep 1.4
hpatch
weight
energy function core overall surface
natives --- --- --- 476 27.8 1100 ---
standard, no refE + unfoldedE, training 55.9 32.8 17.9 1403 48.1 1837 ---
standard, no refE + unfoldedE, hpatch-SASA, training 50.6 31.8 18.9 424 29.3 1024 0.5

standard, no refE + unfoldedE, test 47.7 30.5 21.0 1479 46.4 1844 ---
standard, no refE + unfoldedE, hpatch-SASA, test 48.4 29.8 19.9 464 30.3 1064 0.5
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure