. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011 Jun 20;30(11):1965–1973. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2160192

TABLE I.

Performance Comparison Between the CMDM Coil and the Two-Pole Coil in Terms of Q-Values and the Electromagnetic Isolation Between Channels in Both Unloaded and Loaded Cases. In All the Measurements, the Coil’s Input Impedance Was Well Matched to the System at 50 Ω

		CMDM		Two-pole
		C13	H1	C13	H1
Unloaded	Q value	300	246	178	185
Unloaded	S21(dB)	−50	−45	−15	−22
Loaded	Q value	150	52	66	50
Loaded	S21(dB)	−44	−44	−13	−21