Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 23;141(2 Suppl):e152S–e184S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2295

Table 2.

—[Section 2.1] Warfarin 10 mg Loading Dose Nomogram Compared With Warfarin 5 mg Loading Dose Nomogram for Warfarin Initiation7,8,10,11

Outcomes No. of Participants (Studies), Follow-up Quality of the Evidence (GRADE) Relative Effect (95% CI) Anticipated Absolute Effects
Risk With Warfarin 5 mg Loading Dose Nomogram Risk Difference With Warfarin 10 mg Loading Dose Nomogram (95% CI)
Bleeding events
420 (3 studiesa-c), 5-90 dd
Very lowe-g due to indirectness, imprecision
OR 1.90 (0.17-21.1)
5 per 1,000
0 more per 1,000 (from 10 fewer to 20 more)h
Recurrent VTE 420 (3 studiesa-c) Very lowe-g due to indirectness, imprecision Not estimable 0 per 1,000 10 more per 1,000 (from 30 more to 0 more)i

GRADE = Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. See Table 1 legend for expansion of other abbreviation.

a

All pooled studies included only patients with acute VTE. Studies from which data could be pooled are Kovacs et al,9 Quiroz et al,10 and Schulman et al.11

b

Minimal loss to follow-up; adherence to intention-to-treat principle in two of three studies; follow-up period short but adequate for this outcome; any lack of blinding should not impact objective outcome (laboratory value, INR); adequate allocation concealment; sample size calculations reported for two of three studies.

c

Results based on only three studies; one study shows no difference; one shows statistically significant reduction in time to therapeutic INR; and one had two parts to it, where one showed statistically significant reduction and the other did not.

d

Mean follow-up period of 5 d for patients in the loading dose warfarin group from Schulman et al11 (this was the shortest period, only mean is available).

e

Data collectors unblinded.

f

Indirect given application aimed at outpatients with VTE; follow-up period is very short in two of three studies (5 d-2 wk).

g

No studies were powered to detect differences in bleeding events between groups. Number of events is too sparse to draw any conclusions.

h

Very small number of events; risk difference calculated.

i

OR not estimable; absolute risk difference calculated.