Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e637S–e668S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2306

Table 5.

—[Secions 3.1.1-3.1.5] Aspirin Plus Clopidogrel vs Aspirin in the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events3

Outcomes Participants (Studies), Follow-up Quality of the Evidence (GRADE) Relative Effect (95% CI) Anticipated Absolute Effects Over 5 y
Risk With Aspirin Risk Difference With Aspirin + Clopidogrel (95% CI)
Total mortalitya
15,603 (1 RCT), 28 mo
Moderate due to imprecisionb
RR 0.99 (0.86-1.14)
120 per 1,000c
No significant difference; 1 fewer per 1,000 (from 17 fewer to 17 more)
MI nonfatal events
15,603 (1 RCT), 28 mo
Moderate due to imprecisionb
RR 0.94 (0.75-1.18)
80 per 1,000c
No significant difference; 5 fewer per 1,000 (from 20 fewer to 14 more)
Stroke includes nonfatal ischemic and hemorrhagic strokesd
15,603 (1 RCT), 28 mo
Moderate due to imprecisionb
RR 0.81 (0.64-1.02)
110 per 1,000c
No significant difference; 21 fewer per 1,000 (from 40 fewer to 2 more)
Major extracranial bleede 15,603 (1 RCT), 28 mo Moderate due to imprecisionb RR 1.25 (0.97-1.61) 40 per 1,000f No significant difference; 10 more per 1,000 (from 1 fewer to 24 more)

See Table 1-3 legends for expansion of abbreviations.

a

Of the deaths in the CHARISMA trial, 17 of 571 (3%) with aspirin were fatal bleeding events, and 26 of 574 (4.5%) with clopidogrel and aspirin were fatal bleeding events.

b

Rated down for imprecision because of wide CIs for absolute effects, suggesting important benefit, no benefit, or important harm with clopidogrel for all outcomes. Not rated down for inconsistency, although subgroup analysis found no significant effect of clopidogrel on vascular mortality in patients with established cardiovascular disease in contrast with increased mortality in asymptomatic patients. We judged claim of subgroup effect to be not credible (high number of subgroup hypotheses tested, unclear whether appropriate test for interaction used).

c

Control group risk estimates for total mortality come from the aspirin arm of the CHARISMA trial. Estimates for MI and stroke come from observed events in a meta-analysis of 16 RCTs in secondary prevention (Baigent et al9), adjusted to a 5-y time frame.

d

Of the strokes in CHARISMA, 27 of 189 (14%) with aspirin were intracranial hemorrhages, and 26 of 150 (17%) with clopidogrel were intracranial hemorrhages.

e

We excluded fatal bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage to avoid the double counting of events in the CHARISMA trial. Proportion of severe GI bleeds in CHARISMA was 0.65% (not reported separately for each treatment arm).

f

Control group risk estimates come from observed major bleeding events in the CAPRIE trial, adjusted to a 5-y time frame, and not from the 16 studies included in the meta-analysis or from CHARISMA because these studies did not report major bleeds consistently.