Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 25;95(3):713–725. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.014415

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of the cohort studies included in the pooled analysis of dietary carotenoid intakes and risk of breast cancer characterized by ER and PR status in the Pooling Project of Prospective Studies of Diet and Cancer1

Mean follow-up time Number of cases
Median (10th, 90th percentile) dietary carotenoid intake
Study (abbreviation) Baseline cohort size2 Baseline age range Total ER+ ER− PR+ PR− α-Carotene β-Carotene β-Cryptoxanthin Lutein/zeaxanthin Lycopene
n y y μg/d
Beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial (CARET) 6000 45–69 11.6 367 193 31 163 48 510 (155, 1513) 2649 (1187, 6138) 82 (30, 207) 1375 (714, 2974) 4608 (1918, 9661)
Black Women's Health Study (BWHS) 52,576 21–69 11.5 670 416 254 326 331 417 (92, 1555) 2772 (936, 7393) 120 (34, 289) 1711 (595, 5018) 2964 (1161, 7142)
Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project Follow-up Study (BCDDP) 42,061 40–93 8.4 1305 793 166 667 270 370 (96, 1125) 2621 (1110, 6377) 79 (10, 198) 1708 (607, 5610) 1134 (242, 3176)
California Teachers Study (CTS) 100,067 22–104 7.6 2696 1930 343 1544 625 369 (105, 1090) 1862 (869, 3971) 75 (19, 218) 1070 (451, 2432) 1883 (834, 3685)
Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort (CPSII) 74,138 50–74 9.3 2999 1835 323 1483 561 287 (90, 799) 2202 (968, 4807) 67 (9, 152) 1359 (446, 3903) 3748 (1422, 8203)
Canadian National Breast Screening Study (CNBSS) 45,185 40–59 16.3 1240 367 125 309 140 769 (274, 1875) 4153 (2254, 8002) 69 (16, 153) 2246 (1007, 5630) 6433 (1776, 17,875)
CLUE II: Campaign Against Cancer and Heart Disease (CLUE II) 8867 18–93 14.9 306 208 56 176 86 209 (47, 639) 1733 (660, 3971) 39 (4, 138) 1114 (300, 3505) 879 (230, 2344)
Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS) 34,584 55–69 15.9 1849 1329 238 1117 388 486 (225, 1611) 3828 (1793, 7972) 56 (11, 156) 2206 (909, 5024) 3324 (1168, 7850)
Japan Public Health Center–based Study Cohort I (JPHC1) 21,609 40–59 13.7 289 111 69 87 82 279 (122, 570) 2168 (1140, 3634) 502 (183, 892) 3 854 (370, 5557)
Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (MCCS) 22,456 31–75 13.2 799 493 171 420 240 1012 (372, 1928) 4621 (2490, 7644) 293 (88, 660) 1478 (750, 2587) 5583 (2329, 11,055)
Netherlands Cohort Study (NLCS) 62,573 55–69 13.2 2013 700 183 361 199 543 (181, 1274) 2554 (1442, 4643) 169 (25, 460) 2229 (1327, 3749) 886 (185, 2312)
NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study (AARP) 200,758 50–71 7.1 5983 2321 465 1916 787 654 (226, 2259) 3584 (1518, 9230) 167 (52, 389) 2403 (1182, 6073) 5366 (2464, 11486)
Nurses’ Health Study (a) (NHSa) 88,618 34–59 6.3 1122 528 255 389 304 531 (236, 1697) 3579 (1542, 8951) 237 (80, 442) 3012 (1384, 11051) 1131 (234, 3101)
Nurses’ Health Study (b) (NHSb)4 68,394 40–69 18.2 4467 3075 757 2475 1276 586 (207, 1417) 3563 (1792, 6793) 165 (64, 317) 2548 (1167, 4961) 5775 (2900, 11,464)
Nurses’ Health Study II (NHSII) 93,778 27–44 11.7 1331 846 303 765 369 506 (135, 1294) 2863 (1250, 5896) 100 (40, 223) 2061 (856, 4397) 5435 (2930, 11<217)
Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) 28,292 55–74 9.1 1090 858 137 758 227 1040 (455, 2201) 4293 (2266, 7999) 160 (63, 314) 2372 (1422, 4295) 7903 (4207, 14<243)
Swedish Mammography Cohort (SMC) 60,950 40–74 15.2 2605 1605 384 1308 673 542 (113, 1640) 2289 (937, 5292) 239 (21, 936) 1145 (561, 1960) 820 (136, 2258)
Women's Health Study (WHS) 38,385 45–89 9.7 1177 937 187 819 288 590 (183, 1577) 3557 (1682, 7065) 44 (9, 133) 2869 (1107, 6272) 7111 (3078, 15<485)
Women's Lifestyle and Health Study (WLHS) 47,514 30–49 14.9 1072 737 196 613 309 402 (98, 1494) 1676 (655, 4554) 108 (20, 344) 1042 (238, 2672) 706 (129, 1785)
Total 1,028,438 33,380 19,282 4643 15,696 7203
1

ER, estrogen receptor; ER+, estrogen receptor positive; ER−, estrogen receptor negative; PR, progesterone receptor; PR+, progesterone receptor positive; PR−, progesterone receptor negative.

2

Cohort size reflects the size after application of study-specific exclusion criteria and further exclusion of participants with energy intakes >3 SDs of their loge-transformed study-specific mean energy intake and history of cancer diagnosis at baseline (except for nonmelanoma skin cancer); the Netherlands Cohort Study was analyzed as a case-cohort study, and the above exclusions were not applied to its baseline cohort size.

3

Intake was not assessed, and the Japan Public Health Center–based Study was excluded from the analysis on lutein/zeaxanthin.

4

We analyzed the Nurses’ Health Study as 2 different cohorts [1980–1986, Nurses’ Health Study (a); 1986–2006, Nurses’ Health Study (b)]; The Nurses’ Health Study (b) was not included in the total cohort size because these participants were included in the Nurses’ Health Study (a).