Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 21;1(2):e000391. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000391

Table 2.

Respondents' opinion to what extent patient-specific prognostic factors influence their clinical decision making in the treatment of CLBP

Patient factor
p Value*
Maximum number of levels for fusion 1 Level 2 Levels ≥3 Levels
18 (30.5) 23 (39.0) 18 (30.5) <0.001
Minimum age patient <20 years 20–30 years ≥30 years <0.001
15 (24.6) 25 (41.0) 21 (34.4)
Maximum age patient 40–50 years 50–60 years ≥60 years NS
5 (8.1) 12 (19.4) 45 (72.5)
Minimal length conservative therapy <6 months 6 months to 1 year ≥1 year NS
3 (4.8) 36 (58.1) 23 (37.1)
Maximum body mass index <31 31–37 ≥37 <0.001
29 (46.8) 18 (29.0) 15 (24.2)
Maximum number of cigarettes/day 0 1–20 ≥20 <0.001
29 (47.5) 7 (11.4) 25 (40.9)
Referral overweight patients to dietician Always Sometimes Never <0.001
29 (46.8) 20 (32.3) 13 (21.0)
Psychological screening referral Always Sometimes Never <0.001
10 (16.2) 28 (45.2) 24 (38.7)
Different criteria for primary DDD vs prior spine surgery Agree Neutral Disagree NS
44 (71.0) 8 (12.9) 10 (16.1)
Work status affects outcome Agree Neutral Disagree <0.001
29 (46.7) 17 (27.4) 16 (25.9)
Litigation procedures affect outcome Agree Neutral Disagree NS
43 (69.3) 9 (14.5) 10 (16.2)

The numbers listed are percentages of valid responses.

*

χ2 test: p<0.05 means significantly <70% consensus, NS implies uniformity.

DDD, degenerative disc disease; NS, not significant.