Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biomaterials. 2011 Nov 14;33(5):1201–1237. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.059

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Apparent Gibbs’ surface excess scaled as a function of adsorbent surface water wettability (surface energy) as measured by the advancing contact angle θa of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution, expressed as water (buffer) adhesion tension τ° = γlv cosθa for incrementally sampling the full range of observable water wettability (where buffer interfacial tension γlv = 71.97 mJ/m2; SiOx = oxidized silicon semi-conductor wafer, APTES = aminopropyltriethoxysilane silanized SiOx, PS = polystyrene spun-coated onto SiOx, SAM = 1-hexadecanethiol self-assembled monolayer on gold-coated SiOx). Symbols and error bars represent mean and standard deviation of ten different proteins spanning three orders of MW (ubiquitin, 10.7 kDa; thrombin (FIIa), 35.6 kDa; FV HSA, 66.3 kDa; Hageman factor (FXII), 78 kDa; fibrinogen, 340 kDa; IgG, 160 kDa; C1q, 400 kDa; IgM, 1000 kDa). See ref. [26] for details. Panel A shows that Gibbs’ surface-excess parameter [ΓslΓsv] decreases monotonically with increasing adsorbent-surface hydrophilicity, projecting [ΓslΓsv] = 0 near the τ° = 30 mJ/m2 pivot point (θ = 65°, see Section 4.2 and Fig. 5). Likewise, the ratio {[ΓslΓsν]Γlν} decreases from +1 to −1 (Panel B) as [ΓslΓsv] decreases from a maximum [Γsl − Γsv] = −Γlv at the liquid-vapor (lv) interface and hydrophobic SAM surface (τ° = −15 mJ/m2) to a minimum [Γsl − Γsv] = −Γlv at the water-wetted (τ° → 73 mJ/m2 surfaces. Smoothed curves drawn through the data are guides to the eye.