Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biomaterials. 2011 Nov 14;33(5):1201–1237. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.059

Table 1.

Conspiring Factors that Influence Measurement of Protein Adsorption

Experimental Variable Factor Impact Comment
Protein Molecular weight Size matters Adsorbent capacity is a function of MW [31, 33, 34, 101] and larger proteins can occupy multiple
layers in the adsorbed state [31, 101].
Solution
concentration
Kinetics and
subsequent protein-
surface interactions
Solution concentration should be compared to that which saturates adsorbent surface which is
seldom reported in literature. Adsorption from concentrated solution is rapid compared to dilute
solution. Protein denaturation is relatively rapid on sub-saturated solution with decreasing rate of
denaturation with increasing solution concentration [38].
Source Molecular
shape/volume
Blood proteins are oblate spheroids in solution [102-107]. Other proteins (such as environmental or
food proteins) may not share this commonality. Degree of glycosylation or de-lipidization.
Number of proteins
in solution
Adsorption competition Adsorption from binary solution is vastly more complex than adsorption from purified protein
solutions [13, 35].

Adsorbent Hydrophilic v.
hydrophobic
Terminology Little agreement among investigators on terminology [71]. Broad categorization of surfaces can
ignore important differences in surface chemistry.
Surface
characterization
Chemistry matters Surface functional groups have different Lewis acid/base strength that affects interaction with water
and proteins [110]. Hydrophilic surface functionalities strong Lewis acid/base strength (electric field)
can adsorb protein by ion-exchange not available to surface functionalities such as hydroxyl,
carboxyl, ether, etc. [34].
ADsorption v.
ABsorption
On v. In Protein entrapped IN the matrix of porous or water-swollen surfaces can appear to be adsorbed.
Adsorption and absorption can be difficult to differentiate and can frequently occur in hydrophilic
materials [17, 110].

Aqueous Phase Media ionic
strength
Electrostatic screening Electrostatic interactions of proteins with adsorbents is shielded in high ionic strength media unless
surface functional groups exhibit very high Lewis acid/base properties [34].
Surface hydration Role of water High vacuum spectroscopies do not account for hydration reactions.

Protocol Adsorbent rinsing Perturbation of the
interfacial region
“Dip-rinse-measure” protocol destroys integrity of the interphase [14] and removes loosely-bound
protein that interacts with more strongly bound protein [96], underestimating total amount adsorbed
[85, 218]. Efficiency of rinsing at interfacial dimensions is unclear and untested.
Protein labeling Experimental artifacts Radio [85-93] and fluorescent [94-96] protein labels significantly affect protein structure and
adsorption properties.
Adsorption
Isotherm
Scaling: moles v.
weight concentration
Complete characterization of adsorption requires measurement of a full adsorption isotherm. One
or a few arbitrarily-selected solution concentrations is usually an inadequate basis for general
conclusions. Should adsorption be compared on a molar or mass basis?
Gravimetry and
Spectroscopy
Surface Sensitivity and
Selectivity
Gravimetric methods measure the same mass? Evanescent wave methods must capture entire
interphase depth and resolve bulk solution contribution.