Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 5;12(1):585–611. doi: 10.3390/s120100585

Table 4.

Comparison with other previous approaches described in the literature.

Approach Method Image Resolution Frame Rate MPPS Processor Type
Presented work Horprasert 1,024 × 1,024 32.8 32.8 FPGA
Oliveira et al. (2006) [11] Horprasert 240 × 120 30 0.824 FPGA
Jiang et al. (2005) [10] MOG 1,024 × 1,024 38 38 FPGA: Xilinx Virtex2 1000
Appiah et al. (2005) [21] MOC 768 × 576 145 61.18 FPGA: Xilinx VirtexII XC2v6000
Bravo et al. (2010) [8] PCA 256 × 256 190–250 11.875–15.625 FPGA: Xilinx Virtex-II Pro XC2VP7
Carr, P. (2008) [13] MOG 704 × 576 16.7 6.46 GPU
Vu Pham et al. (2010) [14] Zivkovic’s Extended MOG 400 × 300 980 112.15 GPU
Ierodiaconou et al. (2006) [12] MOG 352 × 288 21 2.03 DSP