Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb;58(2):e113–e122.

Table 3.

Characteristics of clinicians who referred and did not refer patients for PRT in the past year

CHARACTERISTIC REFERRED (N = 282), N (%) DID NOT REFER (N = 115), N (%) P VALUE
Practice setting* .543
  • Rural 127 (45.7) 50 (44.2)
  • Urban 120 (43.2) 54 (47.8)
  • Mixed 31 (11.2) 9 (8.0)
Accessibility of radiation oncologist .390
  • Somewhat or very easy 154 (70.0) 30 (76.9)
  • Neutral 28 (12.7) 2 (5.1)
  • Somewhat or very difficult 38 (17.3) 7 (17.9)
Cancer patients seen in the past month < .001
  • None 1 (0.4) 9 (7.9)
  • 1 to 5 119 (42.3) 85 (74.6)
  • 6 to 10 77 (27.4) 16 (14.0)
  • More than 10 84 (29.9) 4 (3.5)
Provided palliative care§ < .001
  • Never 2 (0.7) 6 (5.3)
  • Rarely 22 (7.9) 43 (38.1)
  • Sometimes 113 (40.6) 46 (40.7)
  • Often 141 (50.7) 18 (15.9)
Self-rated knowledge score < .001
  • Poor 189 (67.0) 105 (91.3)
  • Fair 87 (30.9) 10 (8.7)
  • Good 6 (2.1) 0 (0.0)
Actual knowledge score# < .001
  • Poor 116 (41.1) 68 (59.1)
  • Fair 103 (36.5) 42 (36.5)
  • Good 63 (22.3) 5 (4.3)

PRT—palliative radiotherapy.

*

N = 278 for clinicians who referred; N = 113 for clinicians who did not refer.

N = 220 for clinicians who referred; N = 39 for clinicians who did not refer.

N = 281 for clinicians who referred; N = 114 for clinicians who did not refer.

§

N = 278 for clinicians who referred; N = 113 for clinicians who did not refer.

N = 282 for clinicians who referred; N = 115 for clinicians who did not refer.

#

N = 282 for clinicians who referred; N = 115 for clinicians who did not refer.