Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 14;6(2):e1507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001507

Table 2. Genetic variability parameters of the strain populations under study.

Population N P MNA He Ho FIS
K = 8 ( Fig. 2A ) *
SP/PT MON-1 16 0.714 2.57 0.276 0.031 0.890
GR/TR MON-1 15 0.571 2.00 0.246 0.019 0.925
L. infantum non MON-1a 12 1.000 5.43 0.710 0.196 0.732
TR/CY non MON-1 12 (13)b 0.929 (1.000)b 3.29 (2.86)b 0.518 (0.533)b 0.180 (0.217)b 0.662 (0.604)b
K = 5 ( Fig. 2B ) **
TR non MON-1 6 (7)b 0.571 (0.786)b 1.64 (2.21)b 0.258 (0.325)b 0.136 (0.211)b 0.498 (0.370)b
CY non MON-1 6 0.857 2.29 0.365 0.226 0.403

N, number of strains; P, proportion of polymorphic loci; MNA, mean number of alleles; He, expected heterozygosity; Ho, observed heterozygosity; FIS, inbreeding coefficient; CY, Cyprus; GR, Greece; PT, Portugal; SP, Spain; TR, Turkey.

*When all 76 strains are analyzed 8 populations are identified by STRUCTURE (Fig. 2A). Here the genetic variability parameters of four of these populations are shown;

a

The two L. infantum non MON-1 populations are analyzed together;

**At a subsequent STRUCTURE analysis the TR/CY non MON-1 group splits into two subpopulations (TR non MON-1 and CY non MON-1, Fig. 2B), which are analyzed here;

b

The respective values when the hybrid EP59 strain is included in the respective population are given in parenthesis.