Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 23;120(2):278–283. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103873

Table 3.

Serum CORT concentration (µg/dL) and adjusted BPb and TPb effects on CORT before and after the TSST.a

Percent difference (95% CI) for an IQR increaseb
Time (minute) CORT [GM (95% CI)] BPb TPb
0 (baseline) 10.7 (9.5, 12.0) –18.5 (–30.8, –4.0) –10.5 (–19.3, –0.8)
5 10.8 (9.8, 12.0) 6.3 (–2.2, 15.7) 2.4 (–3.6, 8.7)
10 12.7 (11.4, 14.2) 5.2 (–8.2, 20.6) 8.4 (–0.4, 18.1)
15 14.1 (12.6, 15.8) 2.8 (–11.4, 19.3) 12.2 (2.9, 22.4)
20 14.3 (12.8, 16.0) 9.1 (–7.4, 28.5) 9.8 (–0.8, 21.5)
40 13.0 (11.6, 14.5) –1.8 (–16.8, 15.9) 6.9 (–2.8, 17.5)
60 11.6 (10.4, 12.9) –6.3 (–19.5, 9.1) 4.5 (–4.8, 14.7)
75 9.7 (8.7, 10.7) –0.6 (–13.6, 14.2) 5.4 (–3.4, 15.0)
AUC 896 (813, 987) 0.7 (–10.7, 13.5) 6.2 (–1.3, 14.3)
GM, geometric mean. aAll follow-up time points are adjusted for baseline CORT values; the model was adjusted for age, education, social inhibition, negative affect, and depression (BDI-II) scores. bEstimates of the percent increase or decrease in CORT associated with an IQR increase in log-BPb or log-TPb are based on a regression model using log(CORT) as a continuous response and log(BPb) or log(TPb) as a continuous predictor.