Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Mar 1;37(5):406–413. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182349bc5

Table 2.

Comparison of operative events between the durotomy and no durotomy groups

Outcome No durotomy (n=348) Durotomy (n=41) p-value
Specific Procedures 0.046
 Decompression Only 18 (5%) 6 (15%)
 Non instrumented Fusion 74 (22%) 7 (18%)
 Instrumented Fusion 251 (73%) 26 (67%)
Multi-level Fusion 78 (22%) 13 (32%) 0.26
Levels Decompressed 0.055
None 4 (1%) 0 (0%)
1 147 (42%) 12 (29%)
2 125 (36%) 13 (32%)
3+ 72 (21%) 16 (39%)
Operation time (min) 205.9 (84) 211.2 (80.7) 0.70
Blood loss (ml) 571.9 (464.4) 668.2 (505.6) 0.22
Blood Replacement
 Intraoperative replacement 117 (34%) 15 (37%) 0.87
 Post-operative transfusion 70 (20%) 11 (28%) 0.40
Length of stay (days) 5.7 (20) 5.6 (4.4) 0.98
Intraoperative complications§
 Vascular injury 1 (0%) 0 (0%) 0.20
 Other 8 (2%) 1 (2%) 0.62
 None 340 (98%) 0 (0%) < 0.001
*

Surgical information was available for 371 non-durotomy and 38 durotomy patients.

Specific procedure data was available for 363 non-durotomy and 37 durotomy patients.

§

No cases were reported of aspiration into the respiratory tract or operation at wrong level.