Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 30.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron. 2011 Dec 30;67(52):10234–10248. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2011.10.031

Table 3.

Ring contraction reaction optimization.a

graphic file with name nihms-332928-f0016.jpg
entry base additive solvent T (°C) yieldb(%)
1 LiOt-Bu t-BuOH 40 71
2 LiOt-Bu THF 40 60
3 NaOt-Bu THF 40 81
4e KOt-Bu THF 40 85
5 NaOH THF 60 89
6 KOH THF 60 87
7 LiOH THF 60 19d
8 LiOH t-BuOH THF 60 78
9 LiOH HFIPc THF 60 87
10 LiOH TFEc THF 60 96
11 LiOCH2CF3 THF 60 90e
12 CsOH·H2O THF 60 48
13 Cs2CO3 THF 60 61f
14 Cs2CO3 TFEc THF 60 86
15 Cs2CO3 TFEc CH3CN 60 100
a

Conditions: β-hydroxyketone 10a (1.0 equiv), additive (1.5 equiv), base (1.5 equiv), solvent (0.1 M) at indicated temperature for 9–24 h.

b

GC yield using an internal standard at ≥ 98% conversion unless otherwise stated.

c

HFIP = 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol; TFE = 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol.

d

Several reaction intermediates observed by TLC and GC analysis; proceeded to 78% conversion.

e

Isolated yield.

f

Reaction did not reach completion at 24 h; proceeded to 67% conversion.