Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 16;4(2):38–44. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v4.i2.38

Table 1.

Demographic and endoscopic characteristics of 832 patients with or without short segment ESEM

Total (%) (n = 832) Short segment ESEM(+) (%)(n = 184) ESEM(-) (%)(n = 648) P value
Age (yr), mean ± SD 67.6 ± 12.9 68.3 ± 12.2 67.4 ± 13.0 0.41
Age (yr), decennium 80- 139 (16.7) 31 (16.8) 108 (16.7) 0.92
70-79 266 (32.0) 63 (34.2) 203 (31.3)
60-69 249 (29.9) 51 (27.7) 198 (30.6)
50-59 97 (11.7) 21 (11.4) 76 (11.7)
40-49 52 (6.2) 13 (7.2) 39 (6.0)
-39 29 (3.5) 5 (2.7) 24 (3.7)
Age (yr), dichotomy 70- 405 (48.7) 94 (51.1) 311 (48.0) 0.46
-69 427 (51.3) 90 (48.9) 337 (52.0)
Gender Male 339 (40.7) 88 (47.8) 251 (38.7) 0.03
Female 493 (59.3) 96 (52.2) 397 (61.3)
Antacid therapy (+) 196 (23.6) 52 (28.3) 144 (22.2) 0.09
(-) 636 (76.4) 132 (71.7) 504 (77.8)
GERD-suggested symptoms (+) 305 (36.7) 68 (37.0) 237 (36.6) 0.92
(-) 527 (63.3) 116 (63.0) 411 (63.4)
Esophagitis (+) 45 (5.4) 10 (5.4) 35 (5.4) 0.73
(-) 787 (94.6) 174 (94.6) 613 (94.6)
Hiatus hernia (+) 621 (74.6) 182 (98.9) 439 (67.7) 9.9 × 10-18
(-) 211 (25.4) 2 (1.1) 209 (32.3)

ESEM: Endoscopically suspected esophageal metaplasia; GERD: Gastroesophageal reflux disease.