Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 16.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010 Jan 26;34(4):655–658. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01134.x

TABLE 1.

Association between alcohol involvement and severeity of IPV among couples reporting IPV

IPV (n=436) MFPV (n=297) FMPV (n=376)
Mild % Severe % Unadjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusted1 OR (95% CI) Mild % Severe % Unadjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusted1,2 OR (95% CI) Mild % Severe % Unadjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusted1,3 OR (95% CI)
Any alcohol involvement
 No 75.2 61.2 Ref Ref 74.2 52.8 Ref Ref 74.3 61.0 Ref Ref
 Yes 24.8 38.8 1.9 (1.0, 3.8) 2.2 (1.0, 4.9) 25.9 47.2 2.6 (1.2, 5.6)* 2.2 (0.9, 5.6) 25.8 39.0 1.8 (0.8, 4.0) 2.0 (0.8, 5.4)
Male alcohol involvement4
 No 84.9 69.7 Ref Ref 71.8 53.9 Ref Ref 85.7 70.8 Ref Ref
 Yes 15.2 30.3 2.4 (1.1, 5.3)* 1.8 (0.7, 4.7) 28.2 46.1 2.2 (1.0, 4.8) 1.0 (0.4, 2.9) 14.3 29.3 2.5 (1.0, 6.1)* 1.0 (0.3, 3.0)
Female alcohol involvement5
 No 91.5 83.7 Ref Ref 93.0 75.0 Ref Ref 89.4 82.1 Ref Ref
 Yes 8.5 16.3 2.1 (0.8, 5.4) 2.4 (0.8, 7.0) 7.0 25.0 4.4 (1.5, 12.8)* 3.7 (0.9, 14.9) 10.6 17.9 1.8 (0.7, 4.9) 2.5 (0.8, 8.1)

Note: % indicates weighted proportion; OR denotes odds ratio; CI denotes confidence interval;

*

indicated p-value <0.05

1

Adjusted for couple’s race/ethnicity and household income; and male and female age and history of drug use

2

Adjusted for female-to-male partner violence (FMPV)

3

Adjusted for male-to-female partner violence (MFPV)

4

Adjusted models also adjust for female alcohol-involvement

5

Adjusted models also adjust for male alcohol-involvement