. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 16.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2008 Jun 5;147B(4):517–526. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30630

TABLE I.

Proportion of Allele Sharing IBD From SIBPAL Analysis

Markers	P(IBD)UU	P(IBD)AU	P(IBD)AA
D11S4046	0.48	0.50	0.49
D11S1338	0.49	0.52	0.49
D11S902	0.54	0.50	0.52
D11S904	0.54	0.48	0.50
D11S905	0.53	0.53	0.49
D11S4191	0.51	0.52	0.51
D11S987	0.52	0.49	0.52
D11S1314	0.47	0.49	0.51
D11S937	0.55	0.49	0.51
D11S4175	0.51	0.47	0.53
D11S4090	0.50	0.49	0.50
C957T	0.57^a	0.49	0.50
A-241G	0.49	0.50	0.50
D11S908	0.52	0.50	0.49
D11S4127	0.53	0.51	0.48
D11S925	0.53	0.49	0.52
D11S4151	0.49	0.54	0.49
D11S1320	0.46	0.52	0.50
D11S968	0.48	0.54	0.46

P(IBD) scores shown in the table are estimates of the average proportion of alleles shared identical by descent by concordantly unaffected sib pairs (UU), discordant pairs (AU) pairs, and concordantly affected (AA) pairs.

Only C957T was significant (P = 0.015) Only Caucasian families were used in these analyses.