Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 1;11:121. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-121

Table 3.

CAM Therapies Used Specifically for Diabetes: Overall and Compared by ND Interest

General Category of CAM Therapy
(N, %)
Total Sample (n = 219) ND Interested (n = 106) Less ND Interested (n = 114) P value
Natural Products 93 (43%) 59 (56%) 34 (30%) 0.0001

Mind-Body Therapies 50 (23%) 34 (32%) 16 (14'%) 0.002

Manipulative/Body-based Therapies 20 (9%) 7 (7%) 13 (12%) 0.21

Whole Medical Systems 12 (6%) 9 (8%) 3 (3%) 0.06

Diet-based Therapies 37 (17%) 23 (22%) 14 (12%) 0.07


Individual CAM Therapy
(N, %)
Total Sample (n = 219) ND Interested (n = 106) Less ND Interested (n = 114) P value

Vitamin/mineral supplements 73 (34%) 49 (46%) 24 (22%) 0.0001

Herbal/nutritional supplements 51 (24%) 39 (38%) 12 (11%) 0.0001

Meditation 32 (15%) 22 (21%) 10 (9%) 0.01

Deep breathing exercises 34 (16%) 23 (22%) 11 (10%) 0.05

Massage therapy 14 (6%) 5 (5%) 9 (8%) 0.33

Vegetarian diet 14 (6%) 9 (8%) 5 (2%) 0.22

Yoga 12 (5%) 7 (7%) 5 (2%) 0.48

Low glycemic index diet 12 (5%) 7 (7%) 5 (2%) 0.48

High-dose vitamin/mega-vitamins therapy 12 (5%) 9 (8%) 3 (3%) 0.06

Chiropractic or Osteopathic Manipulation 9 (4%) 5 (5%) 4 (4%) 0.66

Progressive Muscle Relaxation 9 (4%) 6 (6%) 3 (3%) 0.26

South Beach diet 9 (4%) 5 (5%) 4 (4%) 0.66

Atkins diet 7 (3%) 4 (4%) 3 (3%) 0.64

Folk medicine 5 (2%) 3 (3%) 2 (2%) 0.60

Table 3 reports the frequency of CAM use by the entire survey sample and compared by ND Interest subgroups. The reported P-values are for differences in proportions compared between subgroups by chi2 test.