Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 16;8(2):e1002373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002373

Figure 4. PLSA approximates mixture coefficient better than PCA.

Figure 4

PCA and PLSA were performed on a simulated counts matrix Inline graphic with Inline graphic and different number of per-sample counts. The plot shows the average squared correlation coefficient between the true vectors Inline graphic and the three strongest principal components (in the case of PCA) or PLSA estimates Inline graphic. For each per-sample counts value 20 experiments were performed, and the plot gives the mean result and the standard error of the mean. The estimates obtained by PLSA show higher correlation with the true mixture proportions.