Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 16;8(2):e1002379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002379

Figure 9. One and two parameter bifurcation analyses.

Figure 9

Bifurcation analysis is carried out for (A) normal, (B) PTSD, and (C) depressed subjects with kInline graphic as the bifurcation parameter. All the parameters were estimated, and kept constant throughout the simulation except for kInline graphic and KInline graphic values that are differed in the normal, depressed and PTSD subjects. The parameters are given in Table 1. Initially, for simulating the bifurcation diagram, kInline graphic was chosen as 0.001, a stable steady state. As kInline graphic increased, bistability was only observed in depressed patients (shown as inset in (C)), and Hopf bifurcation (indicated as HB) was observed in all the three subjects. Also, Hopf bifurcation began (E-G) and ended (H-J) at different kInline graphic values in all the three subjects. (D) Two parameter bifurcation diagram indicates the presence of oscillations for a wide range of kInline graphic-KInline graphic values, and N (circle), D (dotted circle) and P (star) indicates the estimated parameters for which normal, depressed and PTSD subjects lie in the parameter plane. SS–stable steady state, USS–unstable steady state, and HB–Hopf bifurcation which is supercritical in all the subjects.