Table 3.
Variations in Unprotonated Nicotine Levels in Camel Snus as a Function of Place of Purchase
| Place of purchase (number of samples) | Unprotonated nicotine levelsa, mg/g dry weight |
||
| <2 | 2–4 | >4 | |
| West | |||
| Alamosa, CO (2) | 4.30 ± 0.60 | ||
| Greeley, CO (2) | 4.12 ± 0.21 | ||
| Westcliffe, CO (2) | 4.71 ± 0.33 | ||
| Midwest | |||
| Spenser, IN (2) | 2.79 ± 0.45 | ||
| Indianapolis, IN (2) | 3.61 ± 0.04 | ||
| Lincoln, NE (2) | 1.85 ± 0.06 | ||
| Pacific Northwest | |||
| Anchorage 1, AK (2) | 1.50 ± 0.20 | ||
| Anchorage 2, AK (2) | 1.52 ± 0.13 | ||
| Eagle River, AK (2) | 1.78 ± 0.12 | ||
| Northeast | |||
| Allenstown, NH (2) | 4.65 ± 0.17 | ||
| Nartwick, NY (2) | 1.87 ± 0.09 | ||
| Mid-Atlantic/Appalachia | |||
| Morgantown, WV (6) | 4.28 ± 0.15 | ||
| South | |||
| Suwanee, GA (2) | 5.36 ± 0.01 | ||
| Duluth, GA (2) | 3.36 ± 0.03 | ||
| Paris, AR (4) | 4.79 ± 0.23 | ||
Note. aLevels in all flavors available at a given location were combined to calculate mean and SD.