TABLE 4.
X-ray modeling fits for the MBL dimer, trimer, and tetramer solution structures
Search | Filter | Models | Hydrated spheres | Rg | Rxs | R-factor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
nm | nm | % | ||||
MBL dimer search 1 (0 nm separation) | None | 6,859 | 1,471–1,755 | 7.40–12.30 | 0.05–2.88 | 10.9–15.6 |
N, Rg, Rxs, R | 12 | 1,527–1,733 | 7.60–11.38 | 1.67–2.30 | 10.9–11.6 | |
Best-fit | 1 | 1,695 | 9.88 | 2.11 | 11.9 | |
Experimentala | NAb | 1,609 | 10.42 | 1.84 | NA | |
MBL dimer search 2 (3.3 nm separation) | None | 6,859 | 1,596–1,756 | 7.39–11.83 | 0.13–2.69 | 8.7–16.6 |
N, Rg, Rxs, R | 12 | 1,659–1,731 | 10.43–11.12 | 1.70–2.09 | 8.7–9.1 | |
Best-fit | 1 | 1,710 | 10.43 | 2.09 | 9.0 | |
MBL dimer search 3 (4.8 nm separation) | None | 6,859 | 1,592–1,748 | 7.42–12.10 | 0.02–2.76 | 9.5–16.3 |
N, Rg, Rxs, R | 12 | 1,673–1,718 | 10.66–11.01 | 2.01–2.22 | 9.5–9.9 | |
Best-fit | 1 | 1,717 | 10.79 | 2.10 | 9.5 | |
MBL dimer search 4 (6.6 nm separation) | None | 6,859 | 1,416–1,747 | 7.35–13.80 | 0.01–2.86 | 9.9–16.0 |
N, Rg, Rxs, R | 12 | 1,660–1,712 | 10.25–10.97 | 1.97–2.44 | 10.2–10.4 | |
Best-fit | 1 | 1,684 | 10.46 | 2.32 | 10.2 | |
MBL trimer search 1 | None | 6,859 | 2,269–2,554 | 10.74–14.79 | 0.61–2.99 | 7.1–17.2 |
N, Rg, Rxs, R | 12 | 2,416–2,524 | 10.96–12.26 | 1.34–2.49 | 7.1–7.5 | |
Best-fit | 1 | 2,518 | 12.25 | 2.03 | 7.4 | |
MBL trimer search 2 | None | 2,028 | 2,253–2,591 | 0.34–15.80 | 0.04–3.17 | 7.1–79.0 |
N, Rg, Rxs, R | 12 | 2,507–2,552 | 12.33–12.89 | 1.21–2.15 | 7.1–8.0 | |
Best-fit | 1 | 2,530 | 12.60 | 1.87 | 7.1 | |
Experimentala | NA | 2,413 | 12.43 | 1.95 | NA | |
MBL tetramer search 1 | None | 900 | 3,033–3,411 | 1.20–44.28 | 0.01–7.50 | 14.2 to >100 |
N, Rg, Rxs, R | 10 | 3,221–3,344 | 14.12–17.85 | 1.17–4.1 | 14.5–17.6 | |
Best-fit | 1 | 3,296 | 17.08 | 1.43 | 14.5 | |
Experimental | NA | 3,217 | 13.80 | 2.20 | NA |
a The experimental values are the same in the four dimer and two trimer searches.
b NA means not applicable.