Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 14;287(6):4335–4347. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.314831

TABLE 4.

Titration microcalorimetry data for the interaction between BambL and fucosylated ligands

Experiments were performed twice, and ±S.D. values are expressed for KD and ΔH.

Ligand Fitting model n KD −ΔG −ΔH TΔS
μm kJ/mol kJ/mol kJ/mol
A-tri 1 1.96 0.46 ± 0.02 36.0 53.1 ± 0.1 −16.9
H-type 5/FucLac 1 2.03 0.76 ± 0.07 34.9 46.3 ± 0.2 −11.3
αMeFuc 1 2.02 0.96 ± 0.03 34.3 47.8 ± 1.8 −13.5
H-di 1 2.04 1.03 ± 0.08 34.2 45.7 ± 0.2 −11.5
XFG 1 1.94 6.0 ± 0.5 29.8 53.0 ± 1.6 −23.2
H-type 2 1 1.96 7.5 ± 0.1 29.3 44.4 ± 0.7 −15.2
2, S1 0.97 0.56 ± 0.01 35.7 47.8 ± 1.1 −12.1
2, S2 1.10 14.0 ± 0.3 27.7 39.7 ± 0.9 −12.0
LeY 1 2.00 11.1 ± 0.1 28.3 38.6 ± 0.4 −10.3
Lea 1 2a 18.2 ± 0.7 27.1 28.7 ± 0.1 −1.6
H-type1 1 2a 26.1 ± 0.1 26.2 17.6 ± 0.1 8.6
LeX 1 1.97 34.8 ± 1.4 25.4 39.1 ± 0.2 −13.6
Leb 1 2a 63.7 ± 1.2 23.9 25.4 ± 0.3 −1.5
B-penta 1 2a 95.3 ± 1.8 23.0 25.9 ± 1.2 −2.9
A-penta 1 2a 120 ± 2 22.4 13.7 ± 0.1 8.7

a Stoichiometry value n was fixed during fitting procedure.