Table 1.
Mean No. of Leukocytes (±SEM) × 105 |
||||
Phenotype | WT + Rat IgG | WT + anti–TNF-α | CCR5–/– + Rat IgG | CCR5–/– + anti–TNF-α |
CD4+ T cell | 4.8 ± 1.1 | 14.0 ± 1.8a | 4.9 ± 1.5 | 4.9 ± 1.2 |
CD8+ T cell | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 14.0 ± 1.7a | 3.2 ± 1.0 | 3.5 ± 0.9 |
Neutrophil | 2.1 ± 0.5 | 44.1 ± 5.5a | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 13.0 ± 3.2a |
Monocyte | 3.5 ± 0.7 | 58.0 ± 7.1a | 2.6 ± 0.9 | 16.2 ± 4.0a |
Macrophage | 3.6 ± 0.7 | 60.3 ± 7.5a | 2.3 ± 0.7 | 15.3 ± 3.9a |
Dendritic cell | 5.6 ± 1.1 | 6.0 ± 0.7 | 2.3 ± 0.7 | 1.6 ± 0.4 |
WT and CCR5–/– mice given rat IgG or anti–TNF-α were infected with 2 × 106 yeasts intranasally and lung leukocytes were stained and characterized by flow cytometry at day 7 postinfection. Cell populations were phenotypically characterized by the following surface markers: CD4+ T cells were CD3+ CD4+; CD8+ T cells were CD3+ CD8+; neutrophils were Ly6Ghi CD11b+ CD11c–; monocytes were Ly6Chi CD11b+ CD11c–; macrophages were Mac3+ CD11b+; and DCs were I-Abhi CD11c+. Data represent the mean ± SEM (n = 6–12) from 2–3 experiments.
Abbreviations: IgG, immunoglobulin G; SEM, standard error of the mean; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; WT, wild type.
P < .001 vs WT or CCR5–/– + rat IgG control.