Table 4. Best descriptive linear models for 14 vegetation attributes (VA) as a function of 1, 2 and 3 textural variables (TV) with corresponding R 2, P and R 2 CV values.
VA | TV | R 2 | P | R 2 cv | IRMEAN | REDVAR | REDMEAN | NDVIASM | EVIASM | IRCORR | REDDR | NDVISKEW | NDVIMEAN | EVIMEAN | NDVIDISS | REDCONT | IRVAR | EVISKEW |
BAT | 1 | 0.802 | <0.001 | 0.755 | − | |||||||||||||
2 | 0.926 | <0.001 | 0.900 | − | + | |||||||||||||
3 | 0.958 | <0.001 | 0.907 | − | − | + | ||||||||||||
BAU | 1 | 0.784 | 0.001 | 0.733 | − | |||||||||||||
2 | 0.916 | <0.001 | 0.875 | − | + | |||||||||||||
3 | 0.957 | <0.001 | 0.906 | − | − | + | ||||||||||||
Hgt | 1 | 0.819 | 0.003 | 0.772 | − | |||||||||||||
2 | 0.887 | 0.004 | 0.841 | − | ||||||||||||||
3 | 0.939 | 0.005 | 0.861 | − | − | + | ||||||||||||
Age | 1 | 0.822 | <0.001 | 0.755 | − | |||||||||||||
2 | 0.851 | 0.001 | 0.761 | − | ||||||||||||||
3 | 0.937 | 0.001 | 0.872 | − | − | + | ||||||||||||
CCU | 1 | 0.802 | 0.001 | 0.629 | − | |||||||||||||
2 | 0.884 | 0.002 | 0.777 | − | − | |||||||||||||
3 | 0.931 | 0.002 | 0.807 | − | − | + | ||||||||||||
CCT | 1 | 0.809 | 0.003 | 0.630 | − | |||||||||||||
2 | 0.885 | 0.003 | 0.769 | − | − | |||||||||||||
3 | 0.923 | 0.015 | 0.797 | − | − | + | ||||||||||||
SU | 1 | 0.597 | 0.028 | 0.442 | − | |||||||||||||
2 | 0.877 | 0.005 | 0.792 | − | − | |||||||||||||
3 | 0.910 | 0.012 | 0.849 | − | − | + | ||||||||||||
ST | 1 | 0.743 | 0.001 | 0.636 | − | |||||||||||||
2 | 0.869 | 0.002 | 0.778 | − | ||||||||||||||
3 | 0.897 | 0.036 | 0.776 | − | − | + | ||||||||||||
H' U | 1 | 0.603 | 0.019 | 0.464 | − | |||||||||||||
2 | 0.820 | 0.012 | 0.721 | − | − | |||||||||||||
3 | 0.881 | 0.062 | 0.678 | − | − | − | ||||||||||||
D' T | 1 | 0.721 | 0.002 | 0.560 | + | |||||||||||||
2 | 0.813 | 0.009 | 0.736 | − | + | |||||||||||||
3 | 0.849 | 0.163 | 0.732 | + | − | + | ||||||||||||
D' U | 1 | 0.573 | 0.049 | 0.423 | + | |||||||||||||
2 | 0.774 | 0.035 | 0.650 | + | + | |||||||||||||
3 | 0.843 | 0.178 | 0.436 | + | ||||||||||||||
H' T | 1 | 0.674 | 0.018 | 0.440 | − | |||||||||||||
2 | 0.751 | 0.115 | 0.511 | − | − | |||||||||||||
3 | 0.810 | 0.329 | 0.584 | − | − | |||||||||||||
DnU | 1 | 0.513 | 0.119 | 0.314 | ||||||||||||||
2 | 0.685 | 0.252 | 0.497 | − | ||||||||||||||
3 | 0.778 | 0.548 | 0.379 | − | − | |||||||||||||
DnT | 1 | 0.354 | 0.530 | 0.142 | − | |||||||||||||
2 | 0.652 | 0.360 | 0.417 | − | − | |||||||||||||
3 | 0.750 | 0.691 | 0.459 | − | − | + |
Only those textural variables that were included in at least two models are shown. For the descriptive models conventional R 2 values are reported, while for the predictive models R 2 CV is reported, so the values are not strictly comparable (see Methods for explanation). P–values calculated from the empirical distribution of the largest expected R 2. TV entries in bold typeface are the best models according to AICc when comparing, for each VA separately, models of different type. The plus (+) and minus (−) symbols denote the sign of the coefficients in the models (values reported in Table S2). See Table 1 for vegetational attributes abbreviations. IR: near infra-red band, RED: red band, NDVI: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, EVI: Enhanced Vegetation Index. See Table 3 for the description of textural variables denoted by subindices MEAN, VAR, ASM, CORR, DR, SKEW, DISS, and CONT.