Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 1;175(5):381–390. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr346

Appendix Table 1.

Results From 5,000 Cohort, Subcohort, and Case-Cohort Marginal Structural Analysesa for Null and Alternative Scenarios

Cohort Analysis
Subcohort Analysis (IP-Weighted) Case-Cohort Analysis (IP-Weighted)
Unadjusted Adjusted IP-Weighted
Scenario 1: null hypothesis
    Bias 0.336 0.113 0.001 0.006 −0.015
    Average standard error 0.143 0.156 0.162 0.363 0.212
    Empirical standard errorb 0.138 0.150 0.157 0.363 0.228
    95% CI coverage, % 33.4 90.1 95.8 94.7 93.4
    Type 1 error, % 66.6 9.9 4.2 5.3 6.6
    Root MSE 0.363 0.188 0.157 0.363 0.228
    Relative root MSE 1 2.31 1.45
Scenario 2: alternative hypothesis
    Bias 0.671 0.146 0.001 0.004 −0.004
    Average standard error 0.139 0.156 0.156 0.351 0.217
    Empirical standard errorb 0.131 0.138 0.144 0.332 0.225
    95% CI coverage, % <0.1 87.3 96.7 96.2 94.0
    Statistical power, % 4.3 95.9 99.4 51.5 89.6
    Root MSE 0.684 0.201 0.144 0.332 0.225
    Relative root MSE 1 2.31 1.56

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IP, inverse probability; MSE, mean squared error.

a

1,000 participants per cohort with 25% events; 200 participants per subcohort.

b

Standard deviation of 5,000 log hazard ratio estimates.