Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 25;38(2):316–330. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbq079

Table 5.

Mean Z Scores and Between-Group Differences for Cannabis Using and Nonusing FEP Groups

N FEP + CANN N FEP − CANN p ES
General Intelligence
    Current IQ 54 −1.65 (1.40)* 20 −2.39 (0.96)* .07 0.40
    Premorbid IQ 41 −0.50 (1.14) 16 −0.57 (1.24) .83 0.06
Verbal Memory
    RAVLT—total 40 −0.73 (0.88)* 19 −1.05 (1.17)* .21 0.33
    RAVLT—recall 40 −0.65 (0.96)* 19 −1.09 (1.24)* .15 0.44
    Logical Memory 41 −1.33 (0.85)* 16 −1.59 (0.80)* .21 0.30
Visual Memory
    Visual PA—total errors 47 −0.17 (0.99) 23 −0.59 (1.08)* .10 0.50
    Visual Reproduction 35 −0.19 (0.70) 19 −0.71 (1.17)* .05 0.60
    Spatial Recognition 49 −0.39 (1.01) 23 −0.83 (1.39)* .18 0.39
    Pattern Recognition 49 −1.04 (1.20)* 23 −1.65 (1.50)* .09 0.47
Processing Speed
    Trails A 39 −1.54 (1.58)* 19 −1.98 (3.24)* .48 0.19
    Digit Symbol Coding 44 −1.83 (1.61)* 17 −1.90 (1.60)* .67 0.04
Working Memory
    SWM-errors 49 −0.94 (1.13)* 22 −1.80 (1.30)* .01 0.74
    SWM-strategy 49 −0.48 (0.91) 22 −0.88 (0.86)* 0.12 0.44
    Spatial Span 49 −0.58 (0.91) 22 −1.01 (1.02)* 0.09 0.44
Executive Functioning
    Block Design 36 −0.92 (1.23)* 18 −1.19 (1.65)* 0.62 0.22
    ToL minimum solution 24 −0.19 (0.93) 12 −1.15 (1.37)* 0.03 0.90

Note: Corrected for age and gender differences; ES, effect size (Cohen’s d; unadjusted values); Asterisks reflect that these measures are significantly different to healthy controls. “p” represents the P values for comparisons between the FEP + CANN and FEP − CANN groups. Values in parentheses represent the SD of z scores. SWM, Spatial Working Memory; ToL, Tower of London. Additional abbreviations are explained in the footnote to table 1. Bold values indicate comparisons that were significantly different between the FEP + CANN and the FEP − CANN groups.