Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 9;104(4):273–279. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr514

Table 3.

Comparison of the IMPACT placebo group with placebo groups cited by Kantoff et al. (1)*

Study No of patients Median OS for placebo, mo Reasons why cited placebo group would be expected to have shorter OS compared with the IMPACT placebo group Study funding source(s)
Zoledronic acid (16) 208 15.5 The study did not restrict enrollment to minimal or absent  symptomatology. Among patients, 73% had baseline  pain vs 47% in IMPACT. The study conducted before  TAX 327 demonstrated a 2.9-month survival benefit  for docetaxel, leading to its approval by the FDA  in the year 2004 Novartis Pharmaceuticals  Corporation (now Novartis  International AG)
Docetaxel  (TAX 327) (10,17) 335 19.2 The study did not restrict enrollment to minimal or absent  symptomatology, and 45% of patients had clinically  significant baseline pain vs 0% in IMPACT. Baseline  visceral metastases was present in 22% of patients  vs 0% in IMPACT. Clinically significantly worse  baseline performance status and Gleason scores  than IMPACT patients Aventis (now Sanofi S.A.)
Atrasentan (19) 401 20.3 The study excluded patients requiring opiate analgesia but,  unlike IMPACT, did not enroll 40% of patients under  explicit exclusion of all pain and with favorable Gleason  scores. No eligibility restrictions on patients with visceral  metastases were given. Enrolled from June 2001 to  September 2002, before TAX 327 demonstrated a  2.9-month survival benefit for docetaxel, leading to  its approval by the FDA. The study was conducted  at 180 sites in 21 countries, with variable local  supportive care practices, which could induce bias  in either direction Abbott Laboratories
ZD4054 phase II (20) 107 17.3 The study excluded patients requiring opiate analgesia,  but unlike IMPACT, did not impose eligibility restrictions  on ECOG status, visceral metastases, pain, and Gleason  score. The study was conducted at 65 centers (of which  only 12 were in North America) across four continents  where placebo patients were given “best supportive  care according to local practice,” which could induce  bias in either direction Astrazeneca PLC
Mitoxantrone (21) Kantoff et al. (1) chose the arm receiving the low-dose  prednisone (median OS = 19 months) for comparison,  yet the mitoxantrone plus low-dose prednisone  (median OS = 23 months) would represent a more  appropriate comparator for the IMPACT placebo  group in which 50.3% of patients received docetaxel  and 8% received other chemotherapy. The IMPACT  placebo group excluded patients with visceral  metastases [6% of mitoxantrone group in the study  by Berry et al. (21)] and enrolled 75.4% of patients  with favorable Gleason scores. Patients were enrolled  from March 1997 to Jan 1999, and the results were  reported in the year 2001, before docetaxel was granted  FDA approval Immunex Corporation  (now Amgen Inc)
    Mitoxantrone plus   prednisone arm 56 23
    Prednisone alone arm 63 19
PROSTVAC phase II (9) 40 16.6 Post-treatment chemotherapy usage was neither prescribed  nor monitored. Results reported for the 40 placebo  patients are problematic for the many reasons  outlined by Small and Fong (22) BN Immunotherapeutics  (now Bavarian Nordic)
GVAX (18) ∼310 21.7 Exclusion of opiate pain medication was the only enrollment  criterion used to select for a favorable prognosis Cell Genesys (now BioSante  Pharmaceuticals Inc)
*

FDA = US Food and Drug Administration; OS = overall survival.

There is an approximate number of participants given for this trial because full results have not been published. The study completed accrual of 626 patients in the year 2007, randomized 1:1 between study arms, and all patients completed the initial 6-month treatment period.