TABLE III.
Summary of Sequential Regression Analysis for Variables Predicting Physical Aggression (N=77)
| Variables | R2 | B | SE B | β | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | .05 | |||||
| Time with child | −.23 | .12 | −.22 | .05 | ||
| Step 2 | .17 | |||||
| Time with child | −.20 | .11 | −.20 | .07 | ||
| RTP frequency | .08 | .12 | .08 | .51 | ||
| Dominance | −.30 | .12 | −.30 | .02 | ||
| Step 3 | .25 | |||||
| Time with child | −.22 | .11 | −.22 | .04 | ||
| RTP frequency | .05 | .12 | .05 | .65 | ||
| Dominance | −.27 | .12 | −.26 | .03 | ||
| RTP frequency × dominance | .23 | .09 | .29 | .01 |
Note. Aggression father reports of the child’s behavior on the NLSCY behavior questionnaire. RTP frequency, father’s response to question 11 on the “Pére-En-Jeux” questionnaire; Dominance, rating coding of the father’s relative behavioral control in the video on a scale of 0 (passive) to 4 (dominating).