Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 21;7(2):e31656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031656

Table 2. Different primers used for detecting EBV prevalence in PCR analyses.

Amplification fragments No. of studiesa No. of cases Prevalence Prevalence (%)(95% CI) Adjusted ORb
Bam H1W 12 504 132 26.19 (22.40–30.26) Ref
Bam H1C a 7 598 179 29.93 (26.29–33.78) 1.27 (0.83–1.93)
EBER2 3 141 50 35.46 (27.59–43.95) 1.74 (1.06–2.86)
LMP1 3 127 7 5.51 (2.24–11.03) 0.27 (0.12–0.59)
EBNA1 2 90 2 2.22 (0.27–7.71) 0.29 (0.05–1.64)
BXLF1 1 95 44 46.32 (36.02–56.85) 3.27 (1.79–5.98)
Pol 1 92 19 20.65 (12.92–30.36) 1.06 (0.55–2.05)
Gp220 1 57 13 22.81 (12.74–35.84) 0.15 (0.01–1.76)
LMP2 1 55 1 1.82 (0.05–9.72) 0.24 (0.03–2.18)
BZLF1 1 55 0 0 (0–6.49)c 0 (P = 0.0416)d
EBNA4 1 48 5 10.42 (3.47–22.66) 0.14 (0.04–0.47)
Raji 1 45 0 0 (0–7.87)c 0 (P = 0.0648)d
BALF5 1 45 0 0 (0–7.87)c 0 (P = 0.0648)d
LF3 1 15 6 40.00 (16.34–67.71) 2.53 (0.82–7.80)

95% CI: confidence interval, OR: odds ratio.

a

: One study [10] was divided into six parts because samples from six different countries were tested. Three studies [11], [22], [30] were excluded because one [11] could not offer the EBV DNA prevalence detected by each primer, respectively, and the others [22], [30] only included 1 case.

b

: adjusted by normalizing the constituent ratio of region and DNA specimen of the Bam H1W group.

c

: one-sided, 97.5% confidence interval.

d

: exact confidence levels not possible with zero count cells.