Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 9;74(2):379–396. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0229-0

Table 2.

Response rates in Experiment 2. Crowded. Similar or dissimilar

Identical Trial Similar Trial Dissimilar Trial
Target 88% ± 1% 23% ± 7% 47% ± 4%
Flanker n/a 60% ± 6% 24% ± 1%
Absent 12% ± 1% 17% ± 1% 29% ± 4%
Total 100% 100% 100%

Experiment 2: Average ( ± standard error across 2 observers) frequency of the three kinds of responses produced by the observer when asked to identify a crowded target: the target, the flanker, or an absent letter (neither target nor flanker). The stimulus was a target between two identical flankers. On each trial, the target and flanker were independent random samples from the same six-letter alphabet: L T I N M W. The three types of trials were flanker identical to target (e.g., WWW; 17% of trials), similar to target (MWM; 33%), and dissimilar to target (LWL; 50%). Substitution can account for, at most, 57% of the trials that produced these results (see the Results section and the Appendix, Eq. 7).