Table 2.
Identical Trial | Similar Trial | Dissimilar Trial | |
---|---|---|---|
Target | 88% ± 1% | 23% ± 7% | 47% ± 4% |
Flanker | n/a | 60% ± 6% | 24% ± 1% |
Absent | 12% ± 1% | 17% ± 1% | 29% ± 4% |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Experiment 2: Average ( ± standard error across 2 observers) frequency of the three kinds of responses produced by the observer when asked to identify a crowded target: the target, the flanker, or an absent letter (neither target nor flanker). The stimulus was a target between two identical flankers. On each trial, the target and flanker were independent random samples from the same six-letter alphabet: L T I N M W. The three types of trials were flanker identical to target (e.g., WWW; 17% of trials), similar to target (MWM; 33%), and dissimilar to target (LWL; 50%). Substitution can account for, at most, 57% of the trials that produced these results (see the Results section and the Appendix, Eq. 7).