Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 29;52(2):151–177. doi: 10.1007/s11162-010-9189-9

Table 1.

Description of variables and measures

Variables Scale range
Dependent variable
 Engaged undergraduates on your research project (last 2 years) 0 = no, 1 = yes
Demographic characteristics
 Sex: female 1 = male, 2 = female
 Native language: English 1 = no, 2 = yes
 Racial/Ethnic Background (White is reference group)
  Asian 0 = no, 1 = yes
  Latino 0 = no, 1 = yes
  Black 0 = no, 1 = yes
  Native American 0 = no, 1 = yes
Professional career
 Tenured 0 = no, 1 = yes
 Time since appointed at present institution (in years) Continuous, min = 0, max = 54
 Rank (Associate Professor is reference group)
  Full Professor 0 = no, 1 = yes
  Assistant Professor 0 = no, 1 = yes
  Lecturer 0 = no, 1 = yes
  Instructor 0 = no, 1 = yes
Discipline (Life sciences is reference group)
 Engineering and computer science 0 = no, 1 = yes
 Health sciences 0 = no, 1 = yes
 Physical sciences 0 = no, 1 = yes
Teaching activities
 Taught an honors course (last 2 years) 1 = no, 2 = yes
 Taught an interdisciplinary course (last 2 years) 1 = no, 2 = yes
 Taught a course exclusively on the Internet (last 2 years) 1 = no, 2 = yes
 Taught a seminar for first-year students (last 2 years) 1 = no, 2 = yes
 Number of Graduate courses taught (this academic year) Continuous, min = 0.49, max = 6
 HPW teaching (actual, not credit hours) (average week during this term) 1 = none, 9 = 45+ hours
Other scholarly activities
 Collaborated with the local community in research/teaching (last 2 years) 1 = no, 2 = yes
 Advised student groups involved in service/volunteer work (last 2 years) 1 = no, 2 = yes
 HPW research and scholarly writing (average week during this term) 1 = none, 9 = 45+ hours
 Extent: engage in academic work that spans multiple disciplines 1 = not at all, 3 = to a great extent
 Extent: mentor new faculty 1 = not at all, 3 = to a great extent
Publications and funding
 Number of articles published in academic or professional journals (career) 1 = none, 7 = 51+
 Number of published books, manuals, or monographs (career) 1 = none, 7 = 51+
 Number of writings published/accepted for publication (last 2 years) 1 = none, 7 = 51+
 Received funding for your work from: foundations (last 2 years) 1 = no, 2 = yes
 Received funding for work from: State/federal government (last 2 years) 1 = no, 2 = yes
 Received funding for your work from: business or industry (last 2 years) 1 = no, 2 = yes
Goals for undergraduates (importance of goals for undergraduate students)
 Promote ability to write effectively 1 = not important, 4 = essential
 Help students evaluate the quality and reliability of information 1 = not important, 4 = essential
 Encourage student habits of mind for learning (factor) Continuous, min = −4.15, max = 1.37
 Goal for undergrads: enhance social understanding (factor) Continuous, min = −1.89, max = 1.62
Institutional climate
 Institutional priority prestige (factor) Continuous, min = −2.33, max = 1.33
 Faculty are rewarded for their efforts to work with underprepared students (at this institution) 1 = not descriptive, 3 = very descriptive
 Faculty feel that most students are well-prepared academically (at this institution) 1 = not descriptive, 3 = very descriptive
 Faculty here are strongly interested in the academic problems of undergraduates (at this institution) 1 = not descriptive, 3 = very descriptive
 My research is valued by faculty in my department 1 = Disagree strongly, 4 = Agree strongly
 My values are congruent with the dominant institutional values 1 = Disagree strongly, 4 = Agree strongly
 There is adequate support for faculty development 1 = Disagree strongly, 4 = Agree strongly
Institutional characteristics
 Faculty average: importance of research Continuous, min = 1.50, max = 4.00
 Faculty average: institutional priority is prestige Continuous, min = −2.20, max = 1.17
 HBCU  1 = no, 2 = yes
 Institution has a medical center  1 = no, 2 = yes
 Institutional control: private  1 = public, 2 = private
 Liberal arts institution (masters comprehensive is the reference group)  0 = no, 1 = yes
 Doctoral institution (masters comprehensive is the reference group)  0 = no, 1 = yes
 Institutional selectivity (1 unit = 100 pt. change)  Continuous, min = 8.38, max = 14.67