Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 2;47(2):169–177. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agr156

Table 4.

Predicting harmful/hazardous alcohol use at age 16 using patterns of alcohol frequency and consumption

AUDIT score
0–7 points non-hazardous use (65.3%)
8–15 points hazardous use (29.1%)
16 or more points harmful use (5.6%)
Prevalence
Unadjusted OR (95% CI)
Prevalence
Unadjusted OR (95% CI)
Prevalence
Unadjusted OR (95% CI)
Drinking frequency (n = 4092)
 Low (56.0%) 76.0% 1.00 ref 21.2% 1.00 ref 2.8% 1.00 ref
 Medium (31.4%) 56.1% 1.00 ref 36.7% 2.34 (1.93, 2.84) 7.2% 3.48 (2.28, 5.31)
 High (12.7%) 40.2% 1.00 ref 45.2% 4.03 (3.15, 5.17) 14.5% 9.87 (6.52, 14.9)
Typical consumption (n = 4086)
 Low (61.7%) 74.2% 1.00 ref 22.5% 1.00 ref 3.3% 1.00 ref
 Medium (31.1%) 53.9% 1.00 ref 38.0% 2.33 (1.94, 2.80) 8.1% 3.32 (2.33, 4.73)
 High (7.3%) 38.0% 1.00 ref 47.2% 4.11 (2.95, 5.72) 14.7% 8.63 (5.32, 14.0)

Prevalence indicates the prevalence of each AUDIT outcome group within each latent class, e.g. 76% of the low-frequency drinkers obtain an AUDIT score of 0–7 at age 16 years. Odds ratios from multinomial regression models using the non-hazardous use outcome level as the reference. Frequency and consumption measures were obtained from LLCA using partially observed data set.