Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 4;6:1. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-6-1

Table 4.

Logistic regression analyses of differences in SDQ sub scores, total difficulties score and impact score in the suicide group compared with the accident group and the community sample

Suicide group Accident group Unadjusted Adjusted* Community sample Unadjusted**
OR 95% CI p OR 95% CI p Mean SD OR 95% CI p
Mean SD Mean SD
Emotional
Sub-score
1.3 1.7 .62 .92 1.52 1.1-2.2 .03 1.50 .9-2.4 .09 1.0 1.4 1.1 .9-1.4 .29
Conduct
Sub-score
1.1 1.6 .41 1.0 1.56 1.0-2.4 .04 1.73 .9-3.5 .12 1.3 1.2 1.1 .9-1.4 .42
Hyperactivity
Sub-score
1.9 2.2 1.9 2.0 .99 .8-1.2 1.0 .70 .5-1.0 .06 2.3 1.9 .91 .8-1.1 .29
Peer problems
Sub-score
1.8 1.6 1.3 1.8 1.20 .9-1.6 .15 1.03 .7-1.4 .84 2.5 2.0 1.1 .9-1.4 .06
Prosocial
Sub-score
1.1 1.3 .36 1.3 .71 .5-.9 .04 .88 .6-1.3 .48 1.8 1.6 1.1 .9-1.5 .15
Total difficulties
score
6.3 4.7 4.3 3.9 1.12 1.0-1.3 .05 1.11 .9-1.2 .14 5.7 4.8 1.0 .9-1.1 .41
Impact score***
Yes

(28%)

(9%)

3.8

1.1-13.3

.03

.09

.1-6.1

.91

(21%)

1.5

.7-3.2

.29

*Adjusted for gender, age and the other sub scores.

**The Community control group was not analyzed adjusted because there were no unadjusted significant differences between suicide and community control group which on selection was matched for gender and age.

*** The impact score was answered yes (the behavior had impact on daily functioning) or no.