Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Stat Assoc. 2011 Sep 1;106(495):904–913. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2010.tm10053

Table 5.

Comparison of computation time (in seconds) between ACI, Yang’s CV and Jiang’s BCCV P – BR for squared error loss. Examples where at least the nominal coverage was not attained are omitted

Sample Size n = 30 n = 100 n = 250
Data Set / Method ACI Yang Jiang ACI Yang Jiang ACI Yang Jiang

ThreePt .734 .762 1.37
Magic 1.24 .0392 1.59 1.40 .0834 11.1 1.90 0.178 60.66
Mam. 1.37 .0185 .697 6.03 .0383 5.52 12.8 .0800 .26.3
Ion. 2.13 .0331 1.32 6.42 .0702 10.0 16.7 .147 52.62
Donut 2.00 .00930 4.33 2.16 11.6 10.84
Bal. .977 .0160 .575 1.05 .0315 3.50 1.23 .0660 20.9
Liver 1.16 .0222 .859 1.44 .0461 6.25 1.78 .0978 33.7
Spam 1.38 .0348 1.37 1.53 0.744 10.5 1.72 .159 57.9
Quad .983 .00918 .125 1.11 .0191 1.43 1.24 .0398 6.96
Heart 1.06 .0317 1.25 1.15 .0660 8.00 1.42 .139 23.6