Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 28;18(8):767–777. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i8.767

Table 3.

Summary of the meta-analysis on psychometric outcomes measured at the end of each randomized controlled trial

Variable Rifaximin Control Mean difference
Mean SD Total Mean SD Total IV, random, 95% CI
Mental status
Bucci et al[35] 0.8 0.5 30 1.2 0.3 28 -0.40 [-0.61, -0.19]
Loguercio et al[39] 0.42 0.67 14 0.9 0.74 13 -0.48 [-1.01, 0.05]
Massa et al[18] 0.6 0.2 20 1.2 0.3 20 -0.60 [-0.76, -0.44]
Paik et al[21] 0.5 0.7 32 0.3 0.4 22 0.20 [-0.09, 0.49]
Parini et al[34] 0.22 0.39 15 0.16 0.34 15 0.06 [-0.20, 0.32]
Subtotal (95% CI) 111 98 -0.24 [-0.57, 0.08]
Heterogeneity: Tau² = 0.11; χ² = 32.85, df = 4 (P < 0.00001); = 88%
Test for overall effect: Z = 1.45 (P = 0.15)
Asterixis
Bucci et al[35] 0.5 0.3 30 0.9 0.5 28 -0.40 [-0.61, -0.19]
Mas et al[36] 0 0.5 50 0 0.5 53 0.00 [-0.19, 0.19]
Massa et al[18] 0.1 0.2 20 0.1 0.2 20 0.00 [-0.12, 0.12]
Paik et al[21] 0.3 0.7 32 0.4 0.6 22 -0.10 [-0.45, 0.25]
Parini et al[34] 0.28 0.5 15 0.16 0.04 15 0.12 [-0.13, 0.37]
Pedretti et al[25] 1.6 0.7 15 2 0.8 15 -0.40 [-0.94, 0.14]
Subtotal (95% CI) 162 153 -0.10 [-0.26, 0.07]
Heterogeneity: Tau² = 0.02; χ² = 14.47, df = 5 (P = 0.01); = 65%
Test for overall effect: Z = 1.15 (P = 0.25)
EEG
Bucci et al[35] 0.4 0.2 30 0.6 0.3 28 -0.20 [-0.33, -0.07]
Mas et al[36] 0.6 0.9 50 0.9 0.9 53 -0.30 [-0.65, 0.05]
Pedretti et al[25] 0.4 0.5 15 0.6 0.6 15 -0.20 [-0.60, 0.20]
Subtotal (95% CI) 95 96 -0.21 [-0.33, -0.09]
Heterogeneity: Tau² = 0.00; χ² = 0.28, df = 2 (P = 0.87); = 0%
Test for overall effect: Z = 3.52 (P = 0.0004)
PSE sum
Mas et al[36] 4 0.1 50 6 2 53 -2.00 [-2.54, -1.46]
Massa et al[18] 3 0.5 20 5.5 0.5 20 -2.50 [-2.81, -2.19]
Pedretti et al[25] 7.1 2.4 15 9.3 2.7 15 -2.20 [-4.03, -0.37]
Subtotal (95% CI) 85 88 -2.33 [-2.68, -1.98]
Heterogeneity: Tau² = 0.02; χ² = 2.52, df = 2 (P = 0.28); = 21%
Test for overall effect: Z = 13.11 (P < 0.00001)

IV: Inverse variance; EEG: Electroencephalogram; PSE: Portosystemic encephalopathy.